She's fallen off the wagon, and is now beating her gay husband during drunken, drug-fueled rages. If she alienates the gay community who will buy her records?
I agree that the green-looby goes OTT, but they do less harm than Monsanto's lies... and they make less (ie. no-) money out of it. I know you're a businessman, but you don't have to support all attempts to make a buck. Some bucks are less honest than others.
I feel bad for her! First he pretends to love her for fame and power when everyone knows he's gay, and now he's suing her? He should move on and leave the poor woman alone.
I'm mixed up about all this. I can't help but feel bad for her little husband. It had to be horrible for him. I just wrote a Hollywood insider (http://www.livejournal.com/users/joancrawford/10517.html?view=217877#t217877) to get some additional insight.
nonsense!!! michael jackson is another man who is copletely misunderstood! a lovely man who loves children; especially boys. i think it's a beautiful thing.
In all seriousness, I worry about his kids. He's paid off past child victims to prevent lawsuits, and now he's got some little white kids of his own. The boys are named Prince 1 and Prince 2. He removed the blond brood mare/mother from the scene almost immediately, and no other relatives ever see the children. He's surrounded with people he pays to cater to his needs. I hope he's put some money in trust for future therapy for the kids.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
Sad Liza...
Date: 2003-10-22 01:33 am (UTC)http://www.livejournal.com/users/ankh156/292740.html?mode=reply
Further comments ?
I agree that the green-looby goes OTT, but they do less harm than Monsanto's lies... and they make less (ie. no-) money out of it. I know you're a businessman, but you don't have to support all attempts to make a buck. Some bucks are less honest than others.
Further :
Date: 2003-10-22 01:38 am (UTC)http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,59-863153,00.html
no subject
Date: 2003-10-22 09:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-10-22 10:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-10-22 10:02 pm (UTC)Normal...Normal?
Date: 2003-10-23 12:04 am (UTC)Re: Normal...Normal?
Date: 2003-10-23 08:55 am (UTC)Re: Normal...Normal?